Armstrong v. Borden's Condensed Milk Company
James Armstrong, Respondent, v. Borden’s Condensed Milk Company Et Al., Respondents, and Otto E. Reimer Company, Appellant
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
O’Brien, J.
This case involves the same question as the case of Kane Company v. Kinney, which we have just decided. ( 174 N. Y. 69 .) The two cases were argued *511 together and are governed by the same legal principles. On the authority of that case the judgment of the Appellate Division must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Paekeb, Oh. J., Babtlett, Mabtin, Yann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.