TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People ex rel. Cent. Un. Tr. Co. of New York v. Wendell

The People of the State of New York Ex Rel. Central Union Trust Company of New York, as Trustee of the Estate of Marcia A. Gavit, Appellant, v. James A. Wendell, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent

People ex rel. Cent. Un. Tr. Co. of N.Y. v. Wendell, 132 N.E. 916 (N.Y. 1921)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 14, 1921
Citations
132 N.E. 916231 N.Y. 6291921 N.Y. LEXIS 799
Headnotes
Tax — interest received from mortgages on which mortgage tax had been paid properly computed as income for purpose of assessment of income tax.
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 5, 1921, confirming, on certiorari, a determination of the state comptroller assessing an additional income tax on the relator for the year 1919. The question at issue was the taxability for income tax purposes, under the provisions of article 16 of the Tax Law, of interest derived from bonds secured by mortgages upon real property situated within the state of New York, upon which mortgages a tax has been paid as prescribed by the provisions of article 11 of the Tax Law.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Absent: Crane, J. Deceased: Chase, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1922: 11923: 119222026peak 1922 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. People ex rel. Hanover National Bank v. Goldfogle202 A.D. 712 (1922)
  2. Palmer v. Mann120 Misc. 396 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Palmer v. Mann120 Misc. 396 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1923)
  2. People ex rel. Hanover National Bank v. Goldfogle202 A.D. 712 (1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list