TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rockefeller v. Lamora

William Rockefeller, Respondent, v. Oliver Lamora, Appellant

Rockefeller v. Lamora, 79 N.E. 1115 (N.Y. 1906)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 13, 1906
Citations
79 N.E. 1115186 N.Y. 5671906 N.Y. LEXIS 1241
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of - the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 5,1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover a penalty under the provisions of the Forest, Fish and Game Law because of defendant’s trespassing upon and taking fish from a stream where it flowed across plaintiff’s private park.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight,Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscook, JJ. Absent: Gray, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1923: 119232026peak 1923 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bowles v. Kinney292 F. 419 (W.D. Wash. 1923)

Most recent

  1. Bowles v. Kinney292 F. 419 (W.D. Wash. 1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list