TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Walter v. Walter

Moritz Walter Et Al., Individually and as Executors of and Trustees Under the Will of Emanuel Walter, Deceased, Respondents, v. Herman N. Walter Et Al., Defendants, and Mary Frank Et Al., Appellants

Walter v. Walter, 91 N.E. 1122 (N.Y. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 8, 1910
Citations
91 N.E. 1122197 N.Y. 6061910 N.Y. LEXIS 1190
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 28, 1909, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term construing the will of Emanuel Walter, deceased.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion'.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1918: 11928: 11931: 11935: 41936: 11938: 11940: 219182026peak 1935 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Green160 Misc. 490 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1936)
  2. In re the Estate of Dudley168 Misc. 695 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)
  3. In re the Estate of Link173 Misc. 217 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1940)
  4. In re the Estate of Stutzer156 Misc. 684 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)
  5. In re the Estate of Hoole156 Misc. 821 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)
  6. Germann v. Reynolds131 Misc. 559 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1928)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of Bates173 Misc. 703 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1940)
  2. In re the Estate of Link173 Misc. 217 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1940)
  3. In re the Estate of Dudley168 Misc. 695 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)
  4. In re the Estate of Green160 Misc. 490 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1936)
  5. In re the Estate of Byles157 Misc. 46 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)
  6. In re the Estate of Hoole156 Misc. 821 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list