TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Famborille v. Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific Company

Luigi Famborille, as Administrator of the Estate of Lorete Famborille, Deceased, Respondent, v. Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific Company, Appellant

Famborille v. Atl., Gulf & Pac. Co., 107 N.E. 1077 (N.Y. 1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 8, 1914
Citations
107 N.E. 1077213 N.Y. 6661914 N.Y. LEXIS 820
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 6, 1913, which reversed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff and granting a new trial and reinstated said verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Werner, Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Miller, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 21918: 11920: 31934: 119152026peak 1920 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Maguire v. Barrett119 N.E. 79 (N.Y. 1918)
  2. People ex rel. H. D. H. Realty Corp. v. Murphy194 A.D. 530 (1920)
  3. Hall v. New York Telephone Co.168 A.D. 396 (1915)
  4. Schaefer v. Ropes113 Misc. 654 (1920)
  5. Gilpin v. Ruppert170 A.D. 405 (1915)
  6. Gambon v. City of New York151 Misc. 201 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)

Most recent

  1. Gambon v. City of New York151 Misc. 201 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1934)
  2. People ex rel. H. D. H. Realty Corp. v. Murphy194 A.D. 530 (1920)
  3. Schaefer v. Ropes113 Misc. 654 (1920)
  4. Trop v. Van Voorhis113 Misc. 697 (1920)
  5. Maguire v. Barrett119 N.E. 79 (N.Y. 1918)
  6. Gilpin v. Ruppert170 A.D. 405 (1915)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list