Duck v. McGrath
Madeline M. Duck Et Al., Respondents, v. Robert H. McGrath Et Al., Defendants, and Sarah E. Bergen Et Al., Appellants
Duck v. McGrath, 106 N.E. 1032 (N.Y. 1914)
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 9, 1914, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings and granted said motion in an action to recover upon a surety bond.
The following question was certified: “Does the amended complaint herein upon its face state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendants Sarah E. Bergen and Edith L. Bergen? ”
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative, on opinion of Burr, J., below.
Concur: Werner, Hiscook, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.