TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Byk v. Enright

Leo P. Byk Et Al., Doing Business Under the Name of Triangle Novelty Company, Appellants, v. Richard E. Enright, as Commissioner of Police of the City of New York, Et Al., Respondents

Byk v. Enright, 148 N.E. 764 (N.Y. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 15, 1925
Citations
148 N.E. 764240 N.Y. 6991925 N.Y. LEXIS 944

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ. Absent: Pound, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1926: 21929: 119262026peak 1926 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Triangle Mint Corp. v. Horgan133 Misc. 802 (1929)
  2. Marvin v. Sloan250 P. 443 (Mont. 1926)
  3. People v. Decker215 A.D. 861 (1926)

Most recent

  1. Triangle Mint Corp. v. Horgan133 Misc. 802 (1929)
  2. Marvin v. Sloan250 P. 443 (Mont. 1926)
  3. People v. Decker215 A.D. 861 (1926)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list