TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Redding v. the City of New York

William E. Redding, Respondent, v. the City of New York, Appellant

Redding v. the City of N.Y., 121 N.E. 887 (N.Y. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 10, 1918
Citations
121 N.E. 887225 N.Y. 6281918 N.Y. LEXIS 834224 N.Y. 6831918 N.Y. LEXIS 1090
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 8, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff while walking on Bleecker street in the city of New York slipped on an accumulation of ice upon the sidewalk and falling received the injuries complained of. The complaint alleged: “ That on or about the 21st day of February, 1914, and for some time prior thereto, the defendant negligently and carelessly permitted that portion of the public highways at or in front of premises commonly known as either 277 or 279 Bleecker street, in the said borough of Manhattan, city of New York, to be and remain in a dangerous and unsafe state and condition, in permitting and allowing an accumulation of ice to exist upon the sidewalk at said place as above stated.” The answer was a general denial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Cuddeback, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Potter155 Misc. 106 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1935)

Most recent

  1. First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Potter155 Misc. 106 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list