TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kriegbaum v. Buffalo Wire Works Company, Inc.

In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Kriegbaum, Respondent, v. Buffalo Wire Works Company, Incorporated, Et Al., Appellants. State Industrial Commission, Respondent

Kriegbaum v. Buffalo Wire Works Co., 121 N.E. 875 (N.Y. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 22, 1918
Citations
121 N.E. 875224 N.Y. 6211918 N.Y. LEXIS 1023
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 14, 1918, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Kriegbaum was in the employ of the Buffalo Wire Works, Company, Inc., and on July 20, 1914, sustained an injury which resulted in the loss of the sight of his right eye. On September 8, 1914, the commission awarded Kriegbaum 128 weeks’ compensation at six dollars and forty-two cents a week, being for partial permanent disability, namely, the loss of the right eye, and the total amount of such compensation was paid to the claimant. At the time this award was made, on September 4, 1914, the papers before the commission showed that Kriegbaum had prior to this accident to his right eye, namely, in the year 1901, practically lost the sight of his left eye. In 1917, on claimant’s application, the case was reopened and the commission, notwithstanding the objections duly made by the attorney for the carrier and employer after the first award had been paid in full, made an award for compensation at the same weekly rate, but for total disability to date from the ■ date of the last payment under the first award. The question was whether, under the circumstances, the state industrial commission had authority to reopen the case and make the additional award.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch, J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 11922: 21925: 11933: 11935: 11942: 119212026peak 1922 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Claim of Metcalf v. Firth Carpet Co.196 A.D. 790 (1921)
  2. Notte v. Rutland Railroad Co.28 A.2d 378 (Vt. 1942)
  3. Claim of Cohen v. Ashford Plumbing Co.203 A.D. 261 (1922)
  4. Claim of Lerner v. Jakwall Embroidery Co.203 A.D. 381 (1922)
  5. McDaniel v. Eagle Coal Co.43 P.2d 655 (Mont. 1935)
  6. Kolodick v. General Electric Co.184 N.E. 54 (N.Y. 1933)

Most recent

  1. Notte v. Rutland Railroad Co.28 A.2d 378 (Vt. 1942)
  2. McDaniel v. Eagle Coal Co.43 P.2d 655 (Mont. 1935)
  3. Kolodick v. General Electric Co.184 N.E. 54 (N.Y. 1933)
  4. Orico v. Fred T. Ley Co.215 A.D. 738 (1925)
  5. Claim of Cohen v. Ashford Plumbing Co.203 A.D. 261 (1922)
  6. Claim of Lerner v. Jakwall Embroidery Co.203 A.D. 381 (1922)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list