Mawhinney v. Bliss
Hugh H. Mawhinney, on Behalf of Himself and Others, Respondent, v. Cornelius N. Bliss Et Al., Defendants, and Edmund C. Converse, Appellant
Mawhinney v. Bliss, 81 N.E. 1169 (N.Y. 1907)
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 25, 1907, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action for an accounting.
The following question was certified: “Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant Edmund 0. Converse?”
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.