TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

White v. Old Dominion Steamship Company

R. Cornell White v. . the Old Dominion Steamship Company

White v. Old Dominion S.S. Co., 6 N.E. 289 (N.Y. 1886)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 13, 1886
Citations
6 N.E. 289102 N.Y. 6601886 N.Y. LEXIS 904

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 662

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 663

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 664

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 665 RUGER, Ch. J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11914: 11919: 11925: 11958: 11965: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Union Bank of Brooklyn v. Deshel139 A.D. 217 (1910)
  2. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.21 F.R.D. 347 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)
  3. Imperial Chemical Industries Limited v. National Distillers and Chemical Corporation342 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1965)
  4. Sanford v. John Finnigan Co.169 S.W. 624 (Tex. App. 1914)
  5. McMahon v. Matthews48 App. D.C. 303 (D.C. Cir. 1919)
  6. Garber v. Levine146 N.E. 21 (Mass. 1925)

Most recent

  1. Imperial Chemical Industries Limited v. National Distillers and Chemical Corporation342 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1965)
  2. Broadway & Ninety-Sixth Street Realty Co. v. Loew's Inc.21 F.R.D. 347 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)
  3. Garber v. Levine146 N.E. 21 (Mass. 1925)
  4. McMahon v. Matthews48 App. D.C. 303 (D.C. Cir. 1919)
  5. Sanford v. John Finnigan Co.169 S.W. 624 (Tex. App. 1914)
  6. Union Bank of Brooklyn v. Deshel139 A.D. 217 (1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list