New York Rubber Company v. Rothery
The New York Rubber Company, Appellant, v. John Rothery Et Al., Respondents
N.Y. Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 23 N.E. 529 (N.Y. 1890)
Summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made June 28,1889, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a resettlement of the case.
On appeal from a former order denying a motion to resettle the case herein (112 N. Y. 592), this court reversed the order and granted the motion. °
The case was brought before the trial court who again refused to resettle it, basing the refusal upon what it describes in its order as an insertion of the “ actual history ” of the matter in regard to which it was sought to have the case amended.
The court here hold that there is nothing in the “ history ” inconsistent with or contradictory of the fact upon which the prior decision was based.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Gray, J., reads for reversal of orders of Special and General Term, and for granting the motion.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.