TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Caylus v. the New York, Kingston and Syracuse Rd. Co.

Ernest Caylus v. . the New York, Kingston and Syracuse Railroad Company, Impleaded, Etc.

Caylus v. the N.Y., 76 N.Y. 609 (1879)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 18, 1879
Citations
76 N.Y. 6091879 N.Y. LEXIS 570
Cited by 8

Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 611

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 612

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 613 EARL, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →
1884–1885: 11900–1901: 11906–1907: 11908–1909: 11920–1921: 11932–1933: 11938–1939: 11940–1941: 118842026peak 1884 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ebenreiter v. Woulf1 N.W.2d 73 (Wis. 1941)
  2. People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. Fagan194 A.D. 185 (1920) · Dissent
  3. MacHine Co. v. Owings.53 S.E. 345 (N.C. 1906)
  4. Bank of Williamsville v. Amherst Motor Sales, Inc.234 A.D. 261 (1932)
  5. Barth v. Loeffelholtz84 N.W. 846 (Wis. 1901)
  6. Hellstern v. Hellstern18 N.E.2d 296 (N.Y. 1938)

Most recent

  1. Ebenreiter v. Woulf1 N.W.2d 73 (Wis. 1941)
  2. Hellstern v. Hellstern18 N.E.2d 296 (N.Y. 1938)
  3. Bank of Williamsville v. Amherst Motor Sales, Inc.234 A.D. 261 (1932)
  4. People ex rel. Rayland Realty Co. v. Fagan194 A.D. 185 (1920) · Dissent
  5. Kahn v. Witkoski115 N.Y.S. 138 (1909)
  6. MacHine Co. v. Owings.53 S.E. 345 (N.C. 1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list