Bishop v. Decker
Eli H. Bishop, Appellant, v. Smith N. Decker Et Al., Respondents
Bishop v. Decker, 116 N.E. 1036 (N.Y. 1917)
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 22,1914, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term. This action was brought to recover an abatement in the contract price of a tract of land upon the exchange by the plaintiff of a flat owned by him for this tract and another piece of Long Island acreage owned' by the defendants. The action is framed upon the theory of legal remedy affording a party a reformation of a contract and conveyance of real property made under a mutual mistake as to the quantity conveyed and granting an abatement of the contract price for a deficiency. Under the contract of sale the tract of land in question was to contain forty-five acres, more or less. It actually contained twenty-five and thirty-six one-hundredths acres. The defense was that the contract provided for a trade in bulk.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Hogan, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.