TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

De Crescenzo v. 274-276 Madison Avenue, Inc.

Angelo De Crescenzo, Respondent, v. 274-276 Madison Avenue, Inc., Defendant, and Thompson-Starrett Company, Appellant

De Crescenzo v. 274-276 Madison Ave., Inc., 177 N.E. 169 (N.Y. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 12, 1931
Citations
177 N.E. 169256 N.Y. 6301931 N.Y. LEXIS 1220

Opinion of the Court

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the ground that Labor Law, section 2.41, subdivision 5, as it read at the time of the accident, did not apply to hoisting apparatus not “ within a building ” and that no liability at common law was established; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Claim of De Crescenzo v. Apex Concrete Co.246 A.D. 662 (1935)

Most recent

  1. Claim of De Crescenzo v. Apex Concrete Co.246 A.D. 662 (1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list