TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Florida Department Of Health And Rehabilitative Services v. Califano

Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, a Department of the State of Florida v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Individually and as Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare (Hew), an Agency of the United States Government

Fla. Dep't Of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Califano, 585 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 27, 1978
Docket
No. 78-2016
Citations
585 F.2d 150

Opinion

585 F.2d 150

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, a Department of the State of Florida, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph A. CALIFANO, Jr., Individually and as Secretary, Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW), an Agency of the United States Government, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 78-2016.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 27, 1978.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; William H. Stafford, Judge.

1

R. Stephen Nall, Fla. Dept. of H & R Services, Tallahassee, Fla., Charles A. Miller, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant.

2

Sarah C. Carey, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae, for Legis '50: The Center for Legislative Improvement.

3

William D. Townsend, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., amicus curiae, for the States of Fla., La., Pa., MT/NE.

4

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., John P. Lagomarcino, Washington, D. C., amicus curiae, for National Governor's Assoc.

5

Clinton Ashmore, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., Carl H. Harper, Reg. Atty., Dept. of Health, Educ. & Welfare, Atlanta, Ga., Eve H. Goldstein, Asst. Reg. Atty., Alvin N. Jaffe, Asst. Reg. Atty., Edward A. McDermott, Anthony S. Harrington, Allen R. Snyder, Washington, D. C., Neil Koslowe, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.

6

Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

7

We affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion, 449 F.Supp. 274 (N.D.Fla.1978).

8

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 119792026peak 1979 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cook v. Commonwealth405 A.2d 1000 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979)

Most recent

  1. Cook v. Commonwealth405 A.2d 1000 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list