Haskell v. Miller
Charles J. Haskell, Respondent, v. Nathan J. Miller Et Al., Copartners Under the Firm Name of Miller & Company, Appellants
Haskell v. Miller, 159 N.E. 675 (N.Y. 1927)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.