Liberatore v. Friedman
In the Matter of the Claim of Antonio Liberatore, Respondent, Against Abraham Friedman Et Al., Appellants. the State Industrial Commission, Respondent
Liberatore v. Friedman, 121 N.E. 885 (N.Y. 1918)
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 5, 1918, which affirmed an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The claimant, who was a journeyman tailor and employed by defendant Friedman as a coat maker, stuck his finger with a needle while sewing by hand on an overcoat. Blood poisoning ensued resulting in permanent injuries. It appeared that he did his work at home and was paid by the piece. The question was whether he was an employee or an independent contractor.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order ¿firmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.