TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

C. S. Goss & Co. v. Goss

C. S. Goss & Company, Appellant, v. Clayton S. Goss, Respondent

C. S. Goss & Co. v. Goss, 101 N.E. 1095 (N.Y. 1913)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 25, 1913
Citations
101 N.E. 1095207 N.Y. 7421913 N.Y. LEXIS 1424
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 8, 1911, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial in an action by a corporation against its former president for an accounting.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Not sitting: Miller, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1918: 11919: 11923: 11924: 11934: 11943: 11946: 11963: 119182026peak 1918 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Quaid v. Ratkowsky183 A.D. 428 (1918)
  2. In re the Estate of Steinberg153 Misc. 339 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1934)
  3. Bartle v. Finkelstein19 A.D.2d 256 (1963)
  4. Cuppy v. Ward187 A.D. 625 (1919) · Dissent
  5. Reconstruction Syndicate, Inc. v. Sharpe186 Misc. 897 (1946)
  6. Tompkins v. Miller, Tompkins & Co.207 A.D. 819 (1923)

Most recent

  1. Bartle v. Finkelstein19 A.D.2d 256 (1963)
  2. Reconstruction Syndicate, Inc. v. Sharpe186 Misc. 897 (1946)
  3. Friedrich v. Martin266 A.D. 93 (1943) · Dissent
  4. In re the Estate of Steinberg153 Misc. 339 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1934)
  5. Dobbins v. Pratt Chuck Co.210 A.D. 278 (1924)
  6. Tompkins v. Miller, Tompkins & Co.207 A.D. 819 (1923)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list