TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Noyes v. First National Bank of New York

Walter C. Noyes, as Receiver of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company, Respondent, v. First National Bank of New York, Appellant

Noyes v. First Nat'l Bank of N.Y., 120 N.E. 870 (N.Y. 1918)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 4, 1918
Citations
120 N.E. 870224 N.Y. 5421918 N.Y. LEXIS 919
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 2, 1918, in favor of plaintiff upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Beginning in 1905 and prior to the appointment of the plaintiff as its receiver, the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company caused certain deposits of money to be made in the defendant bank from time to time for the payment through the bank of certain interest coupons as they matured from time- to time upon two issues of bonds of the railroad company. On January 18, 1915, the date of the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver of the railroad company, there-remained unclaimed balances in the bank. The bank knew of the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver at the time of his appointment. Several months afterwards it began rendering monthly statements to him showing the balances in the accounts. On December 9, 1915, the plaintiff made formal demand on the bank for the sums in the said accounts, which demand was refused. In the submission of controversy the plaintiff demanded judgment for the amounts on deposit with interest, and the defendant demanded a dismissal of the controversy.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on opinion of Scott, J., below.

Concur: Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: His cock, Ch. J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 28 cases

View all citing references →
1920: 11921: 11922: 11923: 21925: 11926: 31932: 21933: 11934: 31937: 21938: 31939: 21941: 11943: 11947: 21953: 11954: 119202026peak 1926 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Nacional Financiera, S. A. v. Speyer261 A.D. 599 (1941)
  2. In re Interborough Consol. Corp.288 F. 334 (2d Cir. 1923)
  3. Ehag Eisenbahnwerte Holding Aktiengesellschaft v. Banca Nationala a Romaniei117 N.E.2d 346 (N.Y. 1954)
  4. Woolley v. City of Natchez89 F.2d 937 (5th Cir. 1937) · Dissent
  5. Vladikavkazsky Railway Co. v. New York Trust Co.189 N.E. 456 (N.Y. 1934)
  6. Northern Sugar Corporation v. Thompson13 F.2d 829 (8th Cir. 1926)

Most recent

  1. Ehag Eisenbahnwerte Holding Aktiengesellschaft v. Banca Nationala a Romaniei117 N.E.2d 346 (N.Y. 1954)
  2. Frazier v. Hanover Bank204 Misc. 922 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1953)
  3. Lewis v. Chase National Bank189 Misc. 190 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1947)
  4. Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.272 A.D.2d 64 (1947)
  5. Driscoll v. Empire Trust Co.137 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1943)
  6. Nacional Financiera, S. A. v. Speyer261 A.D. 599 (1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list