TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Application for the Sale of Real Property Devised by Callahan

In the Matter of the Application for the Sale of Real Property Devised by Cornelius Callahan, Deceased. Edith M. Smith, Appellant; John E. Kelley, Respondent

In re the Application for the Sale of Real Prop. Devised by Callahan, 116 N.E. 1038 (N.Y. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 1, 1917
Citations
116 N.E. 1038220 N.Y. 7741917 N.Y. LEXIS 1252
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 12, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to compel the respondent herein to complete his purchase of real property of Cornelius Callahan, deceased. After making various bequests the decedent gave his residuary estate to his daughter, Edith M. Callahan-Smith, “for and during the term of her natural life and after her death to her issue her surviving and to them and their hems forever.” In the event of his daughter dying without issue he gave the residuary estate to his executors, to be divided in the manner provided in his will. The life tenant and the executors filed them consent to the sale. The purchaser declined to complete the purchase of said property and demanded the return of his deposit on the grounds that the executors named in the will of Cornelius Callahan, deceased, and who duly qualified as such, had no legal right under the will of said deceased to give their consent to a present sale of the real property of said deceased, and that the said proceeding is fatally defective for the reason that the said executors were given no power to sell under the said will during the life of the life tenant, and that, as their power to sell will only come into existence upon the death of the life tenant, who is now alive, their present consent cannot bind the ultimate beneficiaries and remaindermen, and that it is not possible at this time to obtain consent to a sale by such beneficiaries.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list