TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gurney v. Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada

Frederick B. Gurney, Appellant, v. the Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada, Respondent

Gurney v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co. of Canada, 34 N.E. 512 (N.Y. 1893)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 6, 1893
Citations
34 N.E. 512138 N.Y. 6381893 N.Y. LEXIS 919
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made February 10, 1891, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon an order of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1897: 11900: 118972026peak 1897 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Trimble v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.56 N.E. 532 (N.Y. 1900) · Dissent
  2. Cattaraugus Cutlery Co. v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.24 A.D. 267 (1897)

Most recent

  1. Trimble v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.56 N.E. 532 (N.Y. 1900) · Dissent
  2. Cattaraugus Cutlery Co. v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.24 A.D. 267 (1897)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list