TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Friedman

In the Matter of the Application of Dora Friedman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harris Friedman, Deceased, Respondent, for an Order Directing Thomas J. O’Neill, an Attorney, Appellant, to Turn Over Certain Moneys

In re Friedman, 92 N.E. 1085 (N.Y. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 17, 1910
Citations
92 N.E. 1085199 N.Y. 5371910 N.Y. LEXIS 1301
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 4, 1910, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the appellant to pay certain moneys to the petitioner.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Cpncur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wojcik v. Miller Bakeries Corp.142 N.E.2d 409 (N.Y. 1957)

Most recent

  1. Wojcik v. Miller Bakeries Corp.142 N.E.2d 409 (N.Y. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list