TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

George Colon Company v. Hassenpflug

George Colon & Company, Respondent, v. Louise Hassenpflug, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sarah B. Smith, Deceased, Et Al., Appellants, Impleaded With Another

George Colon Co. v. Hassenpflug, 135 N.E. 963 (N.Y. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 31, 1922
Citations
135 N.E. 963233 N.Y. 6701922 N.Y. LEXIS 1094
Headnotes
Liens —• action to foreclose mechanic's lien — defense that notice of lien was not filed within required time and failure to complete work.
Summary
Appeal from a judgment, entered August 2, 1921, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term and directing judgment in favor of plaintiff upon new findings. This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed against premises owned by Sarah B. Smith, now deceased, situated at Merriam and University (formerly Aqueduct avenues), in the borough of The Bronx, the city of New York. The complaint alleged that on March 24, 1913, Sarah B. Smith entered into an oral contract with the defendant Michael J. Fitzgerald, wherein he was to excavate the aforesaid premises for the erection of a building thereon, and upon completing the excavation he was to replace the sidewalk and leave the same in as good a condition' as when he started; that he had performed on his part and that a balance of the contract price remained unpaid. The defense was that the notice of lien was not filed within the time required by statute and failure to complete work. (See Colon v. Smith, 226 N. Y, 101.)

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1954: 12002: 119542026peak 1954 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cherkis v. Impellitteri120 N.E.2d 530 (N.Y. 1954)
  2. V.A.L. Floors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.300 A.D.2d 29 (2002)

Most recent

  1. V.A.L. Floors, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.300 A.D.2d 29 (2002)
  2. Cherkis v. Impellitteri120 N.E.2d 530 (N.Y. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list