TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Guaranteed Title & Mortgage Co. v. Scheffres

Guaranteed Title and Mortgage Company, Appellant, v. Charles Scheffres Et Al., Defendants, and Herman Margulies Et Al., Respondents

Guaranteed Title & Mortg. Co. v. Scheffres, 9 N.E.2d 764 (N.Y. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 13, 1937
Judges
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>
Citations
9 N.E.2d 764275 N.Y. 301937 N.Y. LEXIS 1396

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*32 Per Curiam.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property. The mortgagors appeared generally but defaulted in pleading. Judgment of foreclosure and sale was regularly entered August 9, 1933, before section 1083-a of the Civil Practice Act. became effective. A deficiency resulted on a sale to the mortgagee and judgment therefor was docketed. Thereafter the mortgagors moved the Special Term to vacate so much of the judgment of foreclosure and sale as directed them to pay a deficiency. The motion was granted and the deficiency judgment previously docketed was canceled upon the ground “ that the value of the property exceeded the amount of the judgment.” This is an appeal by the mortgagee from an affirmance by the Appellate Division of the order of the Special Term. The orders should_be reversed and the motion denied.

(Loma Holding Corp.

v. Cripple Bush Realty Corp., 265 N. Y. 463 ;

Emigrant Industrial Sav. Bank v. Van Bokkelen, 269 N. Y. 110 ;

Strochak v. Glass Paper Making Supplies Co., 239 App. Div. 312 . See Kenly v. Huntington Building Association, Inc., 166 Md. 182 .)

The orders should be reversed and the motion denied, with costs in all courts.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 11938: 11939: 21940: 21973: 119372026peak 1939 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. National City Bank v. Gelfert29 N.E.2d 449 (N.Y. 1940)
  2. Vogel v. Edwards27 N.E.2d 806 (N.Y. 1940)
  3. Tompkins County Trust Co. v. Herrick171 Misc. 929 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1939)
  4. National City Bank v. Gelfert257 A.D. 465 (1939) · Concurrence
  5. Chase v. Harvey253 A.D. 15 (1937)
  6. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Rochester Area Council of Churches Development, Inc.76 Misc. 2d 839 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)

Most recent

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Rochester Area Council of Churches Development, Inc.76 Misc. 2d 839 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1973)
  2. National City Bank v. Gelfert29 N.E.2d 449 (N.Y. 1940)
  3. Vogel v. Edwards27 N.E.2d 806 (N.Y. 1940)
  4. National City Bank v. Gelfert257 A.D. 465 (1939) · Concurrence
  5. Tompkins County Trust Co. v. Herrick171 Misc. 929 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1939)
  6. Home Owners Loan Corp. v. Caterson253 A.D. 918 (1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Emigrant Indus. Sav. Bank v. Van Bokkelen, 199 N.E. 23 (N.Y. 1935) 19
Kenly v. Huntingdon Bldg. Ass'n, 170 A. 526 (Md. 1934) 11
Loma Holding Corp. v. Cripple Bush Realty Corp., 193 N.E. 272 (N.Y. 1934) 4
Strochak v. Glass Paper Making Supplies Co., 239 A.D. 312 (1933) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list