Hawkes v. Goll

Jane Hawkes, as Administratrix of the Estate of Russell Hawkes, Deceased, Respondent, v. Harry Goll, Appellant, Impleaded With Another

Hawkes v. Goll, 24 N.E.2d 484 (N.Y. 1939)

Court: New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided: November 14, 1939
Citations: 24 N.E.2d 484281 N.Y. 8081939 N.Y. LEXIS 1224

Cited by 24 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, Hubbs, Loughran, •Finch and Rippey, JJ. Taking no part: O'Brien, J.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(opining that two defendants, who separately injured plaintiff while driving different cars could be joint tortfeasors, even though their wrongful actions “were not precisely concurrent”)

Cayuga Indian Nation of N.Y. v. Pataki, 79 F. Supp. 2d 66 (N.D.N.Y. 1999)
(“While the wrongful acts of the two defendants were not precisely concurrent in point of time, the defendants may nevertheless be joint tort feasors [sic] where, as here, their several acts of neglect concurred in producing the injury.”)

Doe v. Cal Tan, L.L.C., No. 1:19-cv-11587 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021)

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Ravo v. Rogatnick514 N.E.2d 1104 (N.Y. 1987)
Caiazzo v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AG468 F. Supp. 593 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki79 F. Supp. 2d 66 (N.D.N.Y. 1999)
Slotkin ex rel. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co.447 F. Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
Pang v. Minch559 N.E.2d 1313 (Ohio 1990)
Di Sabato v. Soffes9 A.D.2d 297 (1959)

Most recent

Doe v. Cal Tan, L.L.C.No. 1:19-cv-11587 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021)
DiBuono v. Abbey, LLC69 A.D.3d 670 (2010)
In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation447 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)
Wiwigac v. Snedaker282 A.D.2d 801 (2001)
Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki79 F. Supp. 2d 66 (N.D.N.Y. 1999)
Pang v. Minch559 N.E.2d 1313 (Ohio 1990)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list