TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

De Mets v. Moss

George De Mets. Appellant, v. Frank Moss, Executor, Etc., Respondent

De Mets v. Moss, 32 N.E. 1014 (N.Y. 1892)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 29, 1892
Citations
32 N.E. 1014136 N.Y. 62091 Sickels 6201892 N.Y. LEXIS 1754
Summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made February 18, 1892, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Agree to dismiss appeal on authority of Roe v. Boyle ( 81 N. Y. 305 ).

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1897: 118972026peak 1897 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bradley & Currier Co. v. Ward15 A.D. 386 (1897)

Most recent

  1. Bradley & Currier Co. v. Ward15 A.D. 386 (1897)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Roe v. Boyle, 81 N.Y. 305 (1880) 26

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list