People v. Fanning
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Fanning, Appellant
People v. Fanning, 89 N.E.2d 881 (N.Y. 1949)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The defendant’s petition does not sufficiently allege a case of fraudulent use of perjured testimony by the prosecuting attorney to warrant relief by a coram nobis proceeding. The order should be affirmed.
Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Bromley, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed. [See 300 N. Y. 677 .]
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 25 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.