Balais v. Brady Gioe
In the Matter of the Claim of Clementina Balais, Respondent, Against Brady & Gioe Et Al., Appellants. State Industrial Commission, Respondent
Balais v. Gioe, 126 N.E. 899 (N.Y. 1920)
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 21, 1919, unanimously affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant’s husband was killed by faffing into the hold of a vessel upon which he was working. Prior to the filing of the claim herein the present claimant, as administratrix of the estate of her decedent, brought an action in the Supreme Court to recover for the death of the intestate, in which action she was defeated upon the merits, and it is now urged that having elected to sue, the claimant has made an election which operates as a bar to this proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The Appellate Division held that the election of an administratrix cannot be a bar to a claim on behalf of the individuals who are given definite rights under the statute.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts3
- State Trial Courts1
- State Specialty Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.