Farnum v. Harrison
William Farnum, Respondent, v. William H. Harrison, Appellant, Impleaded With Others
Farnum v. Harrison, 113 N.E. 1055 (N.Y. 1916)
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 16, 1915, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of plaintiff in an action under section 57 of the Stock Corporation Law to recover of the defendant, one of the stockholders of the Wishart Dayton Auto Truck Company, the amount of unpaid salary due plaintiff for services rendered to said company as a bookkeeper. The other defendant stockholders have defaulted, the defendant Harrison being the only-one to interpose a defense.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddebaok, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Not sitting: Seabury, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts3
- State Trial Courts3
- State Specialty Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.