TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Martin v. Camp

James G. Martin, Respondent, v. Hugh N. Camp, Jr., as Executor of Frederic E. Camp, Deceased, Et Al., Appellants

Martin v. Camp, 115 N.E. 1042 (N.Y. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 6, 1917
Citations
115 N.E. 1042220 N.Y. 6531917 N.Y. LEXIS 1111
Summary
Motion to amend order denying motion for re-argument. (See 219 N. Y. 170; 219 N. Y. 627.)

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Motion granted to the extent of amending order by inserting the following recital: “Upon the argument of this motion counsel for the respondent James G-. Martin presented and argued "the following point: The decision of this cause made on October 3, 1916, is in conflict with section 10 of article 1 and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.”

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1993: 119932026peak 1993 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Cooperman187 A.D.2d 56 (1993)

Most recent

  1. In re Cooperman187 A.D.2d 56 (1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list