TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ashley v. Walsh

In the Matter of the Application of James R. Ashley, Appellant, Against William E. Walsh Et Al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents; In the Matter of the Application of Multiplex Garages, Inc., Appellant, Against William E. Walsh Et Al., Constituting the Board of Appeals of the City of New York, Respondents

Ashley v. Walsh, 150 N.E. 540 (N.Y. 1925)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 27, 1925
Citations
150 N.E. 540241 N.Y. 5271925 N.Y. LEXIS 599

Opinion of the Court

In each case order of the Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on dissenting opinion of Merrell, J., below.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11941: 21951: 11960: 11963: 11986: 119362026peak 1941 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. Murdock34 N.E.2d 329 (N.Y. 1941)
  2. People ex rel. Di Leo v. Edwards247 A.D. 331 (1936)
  3. Town of Schroeppel v. Spector43 Misc. 2d 290 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1963)
  4. Quick v. Town of Owego11 A.D.2d 285 (1960) · Dissent
  5. City of Buffalo v. Roadway Transit Co.278 A.D. 69 (1951)
  6. Ansonia Associates v. Continental Ansonia Garage Corp.132 Misc. 2d 731 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Ansonia Associates v. Continental Ansonia Garage Corp.132 Misc. 2d 731 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1986)
  2. Town of Schroeppel v. Spector43 Misc. 2d 290 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1963)
  3. Quick v. Town of Owego11 A.D.2d 285 (1960) · Dissent
  4. City of Buffalo v. Roadway Transit Co.278 A.D. 69 (1951)
  5. 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. Murdock34 N.E.2d 329 (N.Y. 1941)
  6. New York Central Railroad v. Limburg261 A.D. 562 (1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list