TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Marsden Electric Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

MARSDEN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent

Marsden Elec. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 586 F.2d 8 (6th Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 6, 1978
Docket
No. 76-2621
Citations
586 F.2d 8100 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 23141978 U.S. App. LEXIS 7946

Opinion

ORDER Before EDWARDS and MERRITT, Circuit Judges, and LAWRENCE, * District Judge.

This case is before the Court upon the petition of Marsden Electric Co. to set aside the decision and order of the N.L.R.B. issued November 22, 1976, reported at 226 N.L.R.B. No. 176. The Board has filed a cross-application for enforcement of its order.

Reviewing the record as a whole, we find substantial evidence supporting the Board’s finding that the company violated § 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act by threatening to close the plant if unionization occurred and by discharging two employees because of their union activities. On the other issue raised by the company concerning the refusal of the administrative law judge to *9 sequester a witness at the hearing, we con-elude that his action in refusing to exclude the witness from the hearing room did not constitute reversible error.

Accordingly, we decline to set aside or modify the order of the Board. The order is enforced.

* The Honorable Alexander Lawrence. Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kux Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989)

Most recent

  1. Kux Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board890 F.2d 804 (6th Cir. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list