Phoenix Bridge Company v. Creem
The Phœnix Bridge Company, Respondent, v. Daniel J. Creem Et Al., Appellants
Phoenix Bridge Co. v. Creem, 78 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered •March 31, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover the expense of defending an action brought against the plaintiff, and the amount of a judgment paid in settlement thereof, which judgment was recovered for personal injuries occasioned by defendants’ negligence in the performace of certain work sub-contracted to the defendants by plaintiff.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Chase, J. Absent: Gray and O’Brien, JJ;
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 34 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.