TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty, N.Y.

In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of This City of New York Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands for the Purpose of Opening Mount Vernon Avenue. Samuel H. Valentine, as Trustee Under the Will of Samuel M. Valentine, Deceased, Appellant; The City of New York, Respondent

In re Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty, N.Y., 87 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1908)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 1, 1908
Citations
87 N.E. 1123193 N.Y. 6581908 N.Y. LEXIS 801
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 8, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming in part the report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in the above-entitled proceeding, but returning it for revision as to assessments for benefits.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 11917: 11933: 11956: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Acquiring Title to Nagy Street99 Misc. 314 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1917)
  2. State ex rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.294 P.2d 418 (Wash. 1956)
  3. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. Reichel-Derfer66 F.2d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1933)
  4. In re the City of New York159 A.D. 410 (1913)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Eastvold v. SUP'R CT. FOR SNOHOMISH CTY.294 P.2d 418 (Wash. 1956)
  2. Johnson & Wimsatt, Inc. v. Reichel-Derfer66 F.2d 217 (D.C. Cir. 1933)
  3. In re Acquiring Title to Nagy Street99 Misc. 314 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1917)
  4. In re the City of New York159 A.D. 410 (1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list