TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Adams v. Bristol

William C. Adams Et Al., Respondents, v. Elias L. M. Bristol, Appellant, and Samuel F. Adams Et Al., Respondents

Adams v. Bristol, 89 N.E. 1114 (N.Y. 1909)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 5, 1909
Citations
89 N.E. 1114196 N.Y. 5101909 N.Y. LEXIS 864
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 16, 1908, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee in an action of partition.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs, and it appearing that since the argument of the appeal one of the defendants, Sarah Jane Hill, has died, it is further ordered that such affirmance be entered as of the 16th of June, 1909, that being the day on which the appeal was submitted to this court for decision; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Grav, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1914: 11924: 11927: 11929: 11930: 11931: 11938: 11939: 11956: 11959: 11962: 11968: 11973: 11975: 119142026peak 1914 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kelly v. Struth164 A.D. 705 (1914)
  2. In re the Estate of Hazley166 Misc. 745 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1938)
  3. Jemzura v. Jemzura330 N.E.2d 414 (N.Y. 1975)
  4. Minion v. Warner144 N.E. 665 (N.Y. 1924)
  5. In re the Accounting of Limberg24 N.E.2d 127 (N.Y. 1939)
  6. Goergen v. Maar2 A.D.2d 276 (1956)

Most recent

  1. Jemzura v. Jemzura330 N.E.2d 414 (N.Y. 1975)
  2. Vlcek v. Vlcek42 A.D.2d 308 (1973)
  3. Cagan v. Cagan56 Misc. 2d 1045 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1968)
  4. In re the Estate of Owens36 Misc. 2d 1031 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1962)
  5. In re the Accounting of Fink18 Misc. 2d 228 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1959)
  6. Goergen v. Maar2 A.D.2d 276 (1956)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list