TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hellman v. Manning Sand Paper Company

In the Matter of the Claim of Jacob Hellman, Respondent, Against Manning Sand Paper Company Et Al., Appellants

Hellman v. Manning Sand Paper Co., 116 N.E. 1051 (N.Y. 1917)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 8, 1917
Citations
116 N.E. 1051221 N.Y. 4921917 N.Y. LEXIS 1339
Summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 1Y, 191Y, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The complainant was injured while in the employ of the Manning Sand Paper Company as a night watchman. While standing on the platform of the employer’s factory two men came along and assaulted him, one taking some money from his pocket, the other stealing his lunch box. During the assault he was thrown down the stairs leading from the platform to the ground, receiving bruises and an injury to the left shoulder. Appellant’s contentions were that the plant was not in operation, the claimant was not engaged in a hazardous employment at the time of the accident, and the claim, therefore, does not come within the provisions of the act; that the assault committed upon the claimant was not due to any special risk connected with his employment, and the injuries, therefore, did not arise out of the employment, and that the award was not based solely upon the injuries incident to the assault, but was also based upon disability arising from a prior accident.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1918: 11921: 11931: 11938: 11971: 119182026peak 1918 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Claim of Spang v. Broadway Brewing & Malting Co.182 A.D. 443 (1918)
  2. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. Purcell132 N.E. 664 (Ind. Ct. App. 1921)
  3. Crites v. Baker276 N.E.2d 582 (Ind. Ct. App. 1971)
  4. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Herring158 S.E. 448 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
  5. Louisville Public Warehouse v. Marcell118 S.W.2d 696 (Ky. Ct. App. 1938)

Most recent

  1. Crites v. Baker276 N.E.2d 582 (Ind. Ct. App. 1971)
  2. Louisville Public Warehouse v. Marcell118 S.W.2d 696 (Ky. Ct. App. 1938)
  3. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Herring158 S.E. 448 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931)
  4. Empire Health & Accident Insurance v. Purcell132 N.E. 664 (Ind. Ct. App. 1921)
  5. Claim of Spang v. Broadway Brewing & Malting Co.182 A.D. 443 (1918)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list