TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Accounting of Canfield

In the Matter of the Accounting of George F. Canfield Et Al., as Trustees Under the Will of Margaret T. Schley, Deceased. J. Montfort Schley Et Al., Appellants; Andrew S. Hamersley, Special Guardian for Ebenezer S. M. Schley Et Al., Respondent

In re the Accounting of Canfield, 138 N.E. 469 (N.Y. 1922)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 12, 1922
Citations
138 N.E. 469234 N.Y. 6161922 N.Y. LEXIS 814

Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs payable out of estate, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1923: 11925: 11926: 11930: 11932: 11933: 21941: 11944: 11949: 119232026peak 1933 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.149 N.E. 827 (N.Y. 1925)
  2. In re the Accounting of the Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.186 N.E. 792 (N.Y. 1933)
  3. In re the Estate of Sidenberg147 Misc. 742 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1933)
  4. In re the Estate of Chaves143 Misc. 868 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1932)
  5. In re the Estate of Von Bernuth127 Misc. 705 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1926)
  6. In re the Estate of Bunker183 Misc. 523 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1944)

Most recent

  1. In re the Accounting of Seaman194 Misc. 224 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1949)
  2. In re the Estate of Bunker183 Misc. 523 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1944)
  3. In re the Estate of Alter177 Misc. 509 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1941)
  4. In re the Accounting of the Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.186 N.E. 792 (N.Y. 1933)
  5. In re the Estate of Sidenberg147 Misc. 742 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1933)
  6. In re the Estate of Chaves143 Misc. 868 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1932)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list