In re Thompson
In the Matter of the Petition of Hubert O. Thompson, Commissioner of Public Works, Etc.; Charles A. Culver Et Al., Appellants; Hiram Farrington, Respondent
In re Thompson, 42 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1896)
Summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made July 26, 1895, which reversed an order of the Special Term directing the payment of an award for damages arising out of the construction of the new aqueduct by New York city.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.