Holcombe v. Munson
Anna M. Holcombe, as Executrix, Etc., Appellant, v. Kneeland J. Munson Et Al., Respondents
Holcombe v. Munson, 9 N.E. 443 (N.Y. 1886)
Summary
This case is not reported for the reason that a majority of the court did not concur in the opinion.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Ruger, Ch. J., reads for affirmance; Miller and Finch, JJ., concur; Rapallo, J., concurs in result; Earl and Dan-forth, JJ., dissent, and Andrews, J., does not vote.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.