TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fitzpatrick v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

James Fitzpatrick, as Administrator, Etc., Appellant, v. the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Respondent

Fitzpatrick v. New York, 98 N.Y. 649 (1885)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 3, 1885
Judges
, Rapallo
Citations
98 N.Y. 6491885 N.Y. LEXIS 711

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per euria~m mem.

for reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in noosuiting plaintiff, that the case should have been submitted to the jury.

All concur, except RAPALLO, J., not voting.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list