Somsak Hoonsilapa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Somsak HOONSILAPA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent
Somsak Hoonsilapa v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 586 F.2d 755 (9th Cir. 1978)
Opinion
The Opinion [ 575 F.2d 735 ] is modified by adding footnote la to the Opinion at Slip Opinion page 1640 [ 575 F.2d at page 738 ] line 3 of part III, following the words, “home in December, 1974, were illegal,” as follows:
“1a We thus do not decide whether the exclusionary rule is applicable to proceedings before the Immigration & Naturalization Service.”
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“It is well settled in this circuit that the mere fact that ■ Fourth Amendment illegality directs attention to a particular suspect does not require exclusion of evidence subsequently unearthed from independent sources.”)
Cited by 23 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.