Claremont v. De Coss
In the Matter of the Claim of Mary Claremont, Respondent, Against Ovid De Coss Et Al., Appellants
Claremont v. De Coss, 116 N.E. 1044 (N.Y. 1917)
Summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 1°, 1916, which affirmed an award of the state industrial commission under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The sole question on this appeal is whether or not there was any testimony before the commission upon which it might determine, against substantial evidence to the contrary, the relation of master and servant existed between De Ooss and Claremont, deceased. Appellant claims decedent was an independent contractor.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Cuddebacic, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscooic, Ch. J., and Hogan, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.