TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brophy v. Bartlett

Joseph Brophy, Appellant, v. Edward B. Bartlett Et Al., Respondents

Brophy v. Bartlett, 15 N.E. 75 (N.Y. 1888)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 17, 1888
Citations
15 N.E. 75108 N.Y. 6321888 N.Y. LEXIS 643
Summary
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made September 22,1885, which affirmed a judgment entered upon an order non-suiting plaintiff on trial. The court here held that the evidence was sufficient to require the submission of the questions of fact at issue to the jury.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Finch, J., reads mem.

for reversal and new trial.

All concur.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1892: 11901: 11919: 118922026peak 1892 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Hayes97 Ala. 201 (1892)
  2. Baldwin v. Abraham57 A.D. 67 (1901)
  3. Luckie v. Diamond Coal Co.183 P. 178 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)

Most recent

  1. Luckie v. Diamond Coal Co.183 P. 178 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919)
  2. Baldwin v. Abraham57 A.D. 67 (1901)
  3. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Hayes97 Ala. 201 (1892)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list