Tiffany Company v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.
Tiffany & Company, Respondent, v. Tiffany Productions, Inc., Appellant
Tiffany Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc., 188 N.E. 30 (N.Y. 1933)
Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and CROUCH, JJ. Not sitting: HUBBS, J.
Opinion of the Court
no opinion.
Concurrence
Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Crouch, JJ. Not sitting: Hubbs, J.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(pre-§ 368-d case enjoining use of “Tiffany” by a movie producer and distributor in action by makers of Tiffany jewelry)
Cited by 69 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals6
- Federal District Courts10
- State Highest Courts6
- State Appellate Courts17
- State Trial Courts30
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. Benson
- Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
- Triangle Publications v. Hanson
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.
- Dawn Donut Company, Inc. v. Hart's Food Stores, Inc. And Starhart Bakeries, Inc.
- Allied Maintenance Corp. v. Allied Mechanical Trades, Inc.
Most recent
- Frank's Rest., Inc. v. Lauramar Enterprises, Inc.
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Rakow
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. And Toyota Motor Corp.
- Sally Gee, Inc. v. Myra Hogan, Inc., Myra Hogan and Sally Lee
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.
- Norden Restaurant Corp. v. Sons of the Revolution
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.