TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rose v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Norman J. Rose, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Respondent

Rose v. Pa. R.R. Co., 142 N.E. 287 (N.Y. 1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 29, 1923
Judges
Hxscock, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews
Citations
142 N.E. 287236 N.Y. 5681923 N.Y. LEXIS 995

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hxscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 11930: 11932: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cole v. Pennsylvania R. Co.43 F.2d 953 (2d Cir. 1930)
  2. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.159 N.E. 896 (N.Y. 1928)
  3. Homac Corporation v. Sun Oil Co.180 N.E. 172 (N.Y. 1932)

Most recent

  1. Homac Corporation v. Sun Oil Co.180 N.E. 172 (N.Y. 1932)
  2. Cole v. Pennsylvania R. Co.43 F.2d 953 (2d Cir. 1930)
  3. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.159 N.E. 896 (N.Y. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list