TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Schall v. Newton

William Schall Et Al., Respondents, v. Byron R. Newton Et Al., Appellants

Schall v. Newton, 157 N.E. 864 (N.Y. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 20, 1927
Citations
157 N.E. 864245 N.Y. 5761927 N.Y. LEXIS 740

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ. Dissenting: Kellogg, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 11929: 11931: 119282026peak 1928 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Conklin v. Newton34 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 1929)
  2. Lafontan v. Elting54 F.2d 664 (S.D.N.Y. 1931)
  3. Conklin v. Newton35 F.2d 541 (E.D.N.Y. 1928)

Most recent

  1. Lafontan v. Elting54 F.2d 664 (S.D.N.Y. 1931)
  2. Conklin v. Newton34 F.2d 612 (2d Cir. 1929)
  3. Conklin v. Newton35 F.2d 541 (E.D.N.Y. 1928)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list