TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Doll v. Coogan

Charles Doll Et Al., Appellants, v. Matthew Coogan Et Al., Respondents

Doll v. Coogan, 61 N.E. 1131 (N.Y. 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 1, 1901
Citations
61 N.E. 1131168 N.Y. 6561901 N.Y. LEXIS 982
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the -first judicial department, entered February 26, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Absent: Parker, Ch. J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1914: 219142026peak 1914 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Barrett v. Schaefer162 A.D. 52 (1914)
  2. Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker165 A.D. 264 (1914)

Most recent

  1. Midtown Contracting Co. v. Goldsticker165 A.D. 264 (1914)
  2. Barrett v. Schaefer162 A.D. 52 (1914)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list