Morrison v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
James Morrison, Administrator, Etc., Respondent, v. the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
Morrison v. N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River Rd. Co., 63 N.Y. 643 (1875)
Headnotes
In an action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence, the absence of contributory negligence may be made to appear as well from the circumstances of the case as from evidence directly establishing the fact. In weighing those circumstances it may be assumed that all creatures are desirous of preserving their lives and keeping their bodies from harm.
Summary
This was an action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of Martin Morrison, plaintiff’s intestate.
The deceased, a boy about fourteen years of age, was driving a team and wagon on the highway at La Salle, Niagara county, across defendant’s tracks, when the wagon was struck by a passing work train and he was injured so that he died the same day. The principal question was as to contributory negligence on the part of the deceased. The court held (Earl, J., dissenting) that the facts and circumstances proved were sufficient to warrant the submission of that question to the jury. The propositions above stated appear in the opinion.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Folger, J., reads for affirmance; Rapallo, Andrews and Miller, JJ., concur; Earl, J., dissents; Church, Oh. J., and Allen, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.