TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hammer v. Michael

Samuel Hammer, Respondent, v. Harris Michael, Appellant

Hammer v. Michael, 155 N.E. 895 (N.Y. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 18, 1927
Citations
155 N.E. 895244 N.Y. 5561927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 243 N. Y. 445 .)

Motion granted, without costs. Return of remittitur requested and when returned the same will be amended by adding a provision that defendant have judgment against plaintiff for the return of his deposit of one thousand dollars, with interest from date of payment thereof.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hammer v. Michael, 154 N.E. 305 (N.Y. 1926) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list